United States Publisher

A no-win, no-fee claim, also known as a conditional fee arrangement, is a type of claim where you are insured against legal expenses. Even if you sue and lose, the other side has to pay your legal fees. America has seen a gradual shift towards no-win, no-fee laws, which target insurance companies, forcing them to provide this protection for claimants. As with everything, there are benefits to this policy, as well as some unintended consequences. Here is a look at the pros and cons of conditional fee arrangements.

Pro: It clearly favors the claimant. Being in an injury case is never easy but knowing you can’t afford adequate legal protection adds insult to injury. Following your accident, any man or woman, regardless of income, can seek justice through the courts.

Con: The conditional fee system has turned America into a more litigious society. The courts are full of absurd claims, such as cases where people sue restaurants over failing to tell them their “hot coffee” will be hot. People abuse the privilege this law affords through self-serving efforts to “just get money.” This creates a lot of extra work for the courts, which in turn reflects a greater tax burden for the rest of us.

Pro: No-win, no-fee has turned us into a more just society. In the past, the size of your bankroll often played the biggest role in the size of your compensation package. If a wealthy person choked on a piece of glass in their steak, their lawyers would win claims in the millions of dollars. Whereas our less-fortunate citizens would routinely suffer with no chance of winning a settlement. Today, you are entitled to an attorney and free legal services (paid for by the other party’s insurance) irrespective of social class. That is definitely an improvement.

Con: No-win, no-fee is one of the culprits behind the health care crisis. It has been cited by multiple Congressional panels as such; Abuse of no-fee, no-win has resulted in a wave of frivolous lawsuits against hospitals and doctors. It is estimated now that only 1/3 of medical malpractice suits are legitimate. This ratio has driven insurance costs for healthcare providers through the roof, and they passed all this cost down to you and us.

Pro: Better prospects for individual recovery post-injury. Before no-win, no-fee, you were likely to get a sum just to cover your expenses immediately after the accident. Chronic issues were not taken into consideration because these require multiple, expert testimonies from doctors and sophisticated grasp of the law, such as only a personal injury attorney would have. Overall public health was worse post-injury as people struggled with whiplash and other chronic pains. Now injury claims include treatment, adjusted for inflation, for decades post-injury. Treatment can also be sought from private care physicians, allowing flexibility in practitioners and access to specialists.

Further reading – Work Accident Compensation